<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Best Windows Antivirus – 2008 Editions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.shamelessreviews.com/the-best-windows-antivirus-%e2%80%93-2008-editions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.shamelessreviews.com/the-best-windows-antivirus-%e2%80%93-2008-editions/</link>
	<description>Scam or The Real Deal?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 06:33:01 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Doug Woodall</title>
		<link>http://www.shamelessreviews.com/the-best-windows-antivirus-%e2%80%93-2008-editions/comment-page-1/#comment-44989</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Woodall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 14:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shamelessreviews.com/2036/the-best-windows-antivirus-%e2%80%93-2008-editions/#comment-44989</guid>
		<description>Im surprised to see Panda do so well. They seemed to dropping behind last year, and they had been so good in the past.
I&#039;d always thought they had a great product.
Thanks for the article, enjoyed it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im surprised to see Panda do so well. They seemed to dropping behind last year, and they had been so good in the past.<br />
I&#8217;d always thought they had a great product.<br />
Thanks for the article, enjoyed it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
